GeMS validation of LITTL2025.1.gdb

File written by GeMS_ValidateDatabase.py, version of 02/19/2025
Wed Dec 31 18:48:41 2025
Runtime parameters
Database path: \MD_2022_Littlestown2025.1_2-submittal\MD_2022_Littlestown2025.1_1-2\MD_2022_Littlestown2025.1_1-2-database\LITTL2025.1.gdb
Output directory: \MD_2022_Littlestown2025.1_1-2-submittal
Metadata file: None
Check embedded metadata: False
Skip topology check: False
Refresh GeoMaterialDict: False
Delete extra rows in Glossary and DataSources: False
Compact GDB: True

This database is LEVEL 3 COMPLIANT.

Check Metadata option was skipped. Be sure to have prepared valid metadata and check this option to produce a complete report.
This file should be accompanied by Littlestown.gdb-ValidationErrors.html and a metadata summary from mp in the same directory.

If this database will be submitted to the NGMDB, it also needs to be accompanied by a reviewed Geologic Names report that includes identification of any suggested modifications to Geolex. Use the Geologic Names Check tool to generate that report or provide other documentation of a review.

Back to Top

Contents

Compliance Criteria
Warnings
Content not specified in GeMS schema
Occurrence of MapUnits in DMU, feature datasets, or geopackage tables
Contents of Nonspatial Tables
DataSources
DescriptionOfMapUnits
Glossary
Database Inventory

Compliance Criteria

LEVEL 1

Criteria for a LEVEL 1 GeMS database are: Databases with a variety of schema may meet these criteria. This script cannot confirm LEVEL 1 compliance.

LEVEL 2--MINIMALLY COMPLIANT

A LEVEL 2 GeMS database is accompanied by a peer-reviewed Geologic Names report, including identification of suggested modifications to Geolex, and meets the following criteria:
2.1 Has required elements: nonspatial tables DataSources, DescriptionOfMapUnits, GeoMaterialDict; feature dataset GeologicMap with feature classes ContactsAndFaults and MapUnitPolys PASS
2.2 Required fields within required elements are present and correctly defined PASS
2.3 All MapUnitPolys and ContactsAndFaults based feature classes obey Level 2 topology rules: no internal gaps or overlaps in MapUnitPolys, boundaries of MapUnitPolys are covered by ContactsAndFaults PASS
2.4 All map units in MapUnitPolys have entries in DescriptionOfMapUnits table PASS
2.5 No duplicate MapUnit values in DescriptionOfMapUnit table PASS
2.6 Certain field values within required elements have entries in Glossary table PASS
2.7 No duplicate Term values in Glossary table PASS
2.8 All xxxSourceID values in required elements have entries in DataSources table PASS
2.9 No duplicate DataSources_ID values in DataSources table PASS

LEVEL 3--FULLY COMPLIANT

A LEVEL 3 GeMS database meets these additional criteria:
3.1 Table and field definitions beyond Level 2 conform to GeMS schema PASS
3.2 All MapUnitPolys and ContactsAndFaults based feature classes obey Level 3 topology rules: No ContactsAndFaults overlaps, self-overlaps, or self-intersections. PASS
3.3 No missing required values PASS
3.4 No missing terms in Glossary PASS
3.5 No unnecessary terms in Glossary PASS
3.6 No missing sources in DataSources PASS
3.7 No unnecessary sources in DataSources PASS
3.8 No map units without entries in DescriptionOfMapUnits PASS
3.9 No unnecessary map units in DescriptionOfMapUnits PASS
3.10 HierarchyKey values in DescriptionOfMapUnits are unique and well formed PASS
3.11 All values of GeoMaterial are defined in GeoMaterialDict. GeoMaterialDict is as specified in the GeMS standard PASS
3.12 No duplicate _ID values PASS
3.13 No zero-length, whitespace-only, or bad null values PASS

Warnings

There are 0 warnings

Content not specified in GeMS schema

Some of the extensions to the GeMS schema identified here may be necessary to capture geologic content and are entirely appropriate. Please document these extensions in metadata for the database, any accompanying README file, and (if applicable) any transmittal letter that accompanies the dataset. Other extensions may be intermediate datasets, fields, or files that should be deleted before distribution of the database.

Fields


Tables


Occurrence of MapUnit in DMU, feature datasets, or geopackage tables

MapUnit DescriptionOfMapUnits GeologicMap
CZicp X X
CZu X X
Trn X X
CZisr X X
CZisp X X
Jd X X
CZscb X X
Qt X X
Qal X X
CZus X X
Trns X X
CZmbs X X
CZiq X X
CZimp X X
CZmb X X
Trni X X
CZitp X X

Contents of Nonspatial Tables

DataSources

OBJECTIDSourceNotesURLDataSources_ID
6Neuendorf et al., eds., 2011modified from Neuendorf, K.K.E., Mehl Jr., J.P., and Jackson, J.A., eds. 2011. Glossary of Geology (Fifth Edition, Revised). Alexandria, VA. American Geological Institute. 783 p.https://www.americangeosciences.org/pubs/glossaryAGI_2011
5FGDC, 2006Federal Geographic Data Committee [prepared for the Federal Geographic Data Committee by the U.S. Geological Survey], 2006, FGDC Digital Cartographic Standard for Geologic Map Symbolization: Reston, Va., Federal Geographic Data Committee Document Number FGDC-STD-013-2006, 290 p., 2 plates.https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/fgdc_gds/geolsymstd.phpFGDC-STD-013-2006
4definitions copied from GeMS, 2020U.S. Geological Survey National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program, 2020, GeMS (Geologic Map Schema)—A standard format for the digital publication of geologic maps: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 11, chap. B10, 74 p., https://doi.org//10.3133/tm11B10.https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/tm11B10GeMS_2020
18Kunk, M.J., Froelich, A.J., and Gottfried, David, 1992Kunk, M.J., Froelich, A.J., and Gottfried, David, 1992, Timing of emplacement of diabase dikes and sheets in the Culpeper basin and vicinity, Virginia and Maryland-40Ar/39Ar age spectrum results from hornblende and K-feldspar in granophyres [abs.]: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 24, no. 2, p. 25.https://www.geosociety.org/GSA/GSA/Events/find-abstracts.aspxGSA_AWP1992_24.2.25
19Maryland State, MD iMAPMaryland State, MD iMAP Data Catalog (DoIT), Maryland Physical Boundaries - County Boundaries (Detailed), publ. 2016-02, updated 2019-09, accessed 2024-09.https://geodata.md.gov/imap/rest/services/Boundaries/MD_PhysicalBoundaries/FeatureServer/0IMAP_PB_CBD_2016
12Jonas, A., 1928Jonas, A., 1928. Map of Carroll County showing the geological formations. Maryland Geological Survey, County Geologic Map, scale 1:62,500.http://www.mgs.md.gov/publications/maps.htmlMGS_CLGEO1928
3Brezinski, D.K., field observationsBrezinski, D.K., field data collection and interpretationsNoneMGS_DKB
11Edwards, J., Jr., and Glaser, J.D., 1993Edwards, J., Jr., and Glaser, J.D., 1993. Geologic map of the Littlestown Quadrangle, Carroll County, Maryland: Maryland Geological Survey, open-file map, scale 1:24,000.http://www.mgs.md.gov/publications/maps.htmlMGS_LITTL1993
2Brezinski, D.K., 2025this reporthttp://www.mgs.md.gov/publications/maps.htmlMGS_LITTL2025.1
14Reger, J.P., Brezinski, D.K., Southworth, S., & Quinn, H.A., 2004Reger, J.P., Brezinski, D.K., Southworth, S., and Quinn, H.A., 2004. Geologic Map of the New Windsor Quadrangle, Carroll County, Maryland. Maryland Geological Survey Digital Geologic Maps, NEWWIGEO2004.1, scale 1:24,000.http://www.mgs.md.gov/output/maps/quadgeo/NEWWIGEO2004_1.pdfMGS_NEWWI2004.1
7Brezinski, D.K., Reger, J.P., Southworth, S., and Vincett III, W.K., 2024Brezinski, D.K., Reger, J.P., Southworth, S., and Vincett III, W.K., 2024, Revised Geologic Map of the New Windsor Quadrangle, Carroll and Frederick Counties, Maryland: Maryland Geological Survey, Quadrangle Geologic Map, scale 1:24,000 (version NEWWI2024.1).http://www.mgs.md.gov/publications/maps.htmlMGS_NEWWI2024.1
10Edwards, J., Jr., 1986Edwards, J., Jr., 1986. Geologic map of the Union Bridge Quadrangle, Carroll and Frederick Counties, Maryland: Maryland Geological Survey, scale 1:24,000.http://www.mgs.md.gov/publications/maps.htmlMGS_UNION1986
13Reger, J.P., and Edwards, J., Jr., 2006Reger, J.P., and Edwards, J., Jr., 2006. Geologic Map of the Union Bridge Quadrangle, Frederick and Carroll Counties, Maryland. Maryland Geological Survey Digital Geologic Maps, UNIONGEO2006.1, scale 1:24,000.http://www.mgs.md.gov/publications/maps.htmlMGS_UNION2006.1
8Brezinski, D.K., Southworth, S., and Edwards, J., Jr., 2004Brezinski, D.K., Southworth, S., and Edwards, J., Jr., 2004. Geology of the Walkersville Quadrangle, Frederick County, Maryland. Maryland Geological Survey Geologic Map, scale 1:24,000.http://www.mgs.md.gov/publications/maps.htmlMGS_WALKE2004.1
17Fisher, G.W., 1978Fisher, G.W., 1978. Geologic map of the New Windsor Quadrangle, Carroll County, Maryland. US Geological Survey. IMAP 1037https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/i1037USGS_NEWWI1978

DescriptionOfMapUnits

OBJECTIDMapUnitNameFullNameAgeDescriptionHierarchyKeyParagraphStyleLabelSymbolAreaFillRGBAreaFillPatternDescriptionDescriptionSourceIDGeoMaterialGeoMaterialConfidenceDescriptionOfMapUnits_ID
1QalAlluviumAlluviumQuaternaryGrayish brown, light brown to reddish tan, poorly sorted, coarse to fine sand, silt, and clay with localized lenses of subrounded vein quartz cobbles. Locally, chips and angular cobbles of local bedrock are included. Thickness of this material ranges from a thin veneer up to 10 feet (3 meters). In smaller tributary streams alluvium has not been shown, but may still be present as a thin veneer overlying a bedrock channel.01-01DMU Unit 1Qal40255,255,179NoneMGS_LITTL2025.1Alluvial sediment, mostly coarse-grainedHighDMU001
2QtTerrace DepositsTerrace DepositsQuaternaryReddish orange to light brown, sandy, clayey gravel with subrounded cobbles of quartz and local bedrock. Commonly occurs as a thin veneer that covers low-lands adjacent to present flood plains. Most extensively developed along Big Pipe Creek and Silver Run Creek. Thickness ranges from 0 to 10 feet (3 meters).02-01DMU Unit 1Qt71255,235,102NoneMGS_LITTL2025.1Alluvial sediment, mostly coarse-grainedHighDMU002
3JdJurassic dike(s)Jurassic dike(s)JurassicMassive, medium to dark gray, fine- to medium-grained diabase, weathering orange brown. Occurs in dikes marked by rows of large, rounded, residual diabase boulders in the soil and at the surface. These dikes may be continuous and are shown as such. The age of the dikes in central Maryland and northern Virginia is early Jurassic (Kunk et al., 1992).03-01DMU Unit 1Jd01.03.02255,0,0NoneMGS_LITTL2025.1|GSA_AWP1992_24.2.25Coarse-grained, intermediate-composition intrusive igneous rockMediumDMU003
4TrnNew Oxford FormationNew Oxford FormationTriassicInterbedded pinkish gray, very coarse-grained, pebbly, trough cross-bedded, argillaceous, arkosic sandstones and reddish brown, silty rooted mudstone and laminated siltstone. Some reddish gray to gray arkosic sandstone (Trns) also occurs near the base of the formation. Sandstone vary from 5 to 15 feet in thickness, while siltstones range from 1 to 6 feet (30 cm- 2 m). Shales and mudstones are intensely rooted or fractures by closely spaced mudcracks that obscures primary bedding. The New Oxford Formation is best exposed in bluffs along Big Pipe Creek. Estimated thickness of the unit is about 1,000 feet (~300 meters).04-01DMU Unit 1^n510153,255,235NoneMGS_LITTL2025.1Sandstone and mudstoneMediumDMU004
5Trnsarkosic sandstonearkosic sandstone subunit of the New Oxford FormationTriassicReddish gray to gray arkosic sandstone (Trns) occurring near the base of the New Oxford Formation.04-01-01-01DMU Unit 3^ns621128,235,222NoneMGS_LITTL2025.1SandstoneHighDMU005
6TrniIrishtown MemberIrishtown Member of the New Oxford FormationTriassicLocalized massive to thick-bedded, grayish red conglomerates interbedded with reddish brown mudstone, shale, and siltstone. Clasts in the conglomerates are predominantly rounded to subrounded cobbles and pebbles of vein quartz and quartzite with maximum dimensions of 8 inches (20 cm) embedded in a reddish calcareous, mudstone matrix. The conglomerate beds creat loose and friable that weather free on the surface. Thickness of the member ranges from 0 to approximately 100 feet (30 meters) with an average of about 25 feet (8 meters).04-01-02DMU Unit 2^ni705102,153,255NoneMGS_LITTL2025.1ConglomerateHighDMU006
8CZscbSams Creek Formation metabasaltSams Creek Formation metabasaltLate Proterozoic to early CambrianOlive green to dark greenish gray, foliated to flow banded, vesicular metabasalt. Basalt intervals appear to be interlayered with greenish gray to silvery gray, tuffaceous phyllite. Some beds are sheared and contain dark purple to black brecciated phyllite containing elongated clasts.05-01DMU Unit 1_Zscb344204,179,179NoneMGS_LITTL2025.1Mafic-composition lava flowsMediumDMU007
9NoneIjamsville FormationIjamsville FormationLate Proterozoic to early CambrianGray, bluish gray, silvery gray, and greenish gray phyllite and limestone containing thin beds of tuffaceous sandstone. Individual mapped units contain varying combinations and percentages of each type of phyllite so that the named lithology is borne by the dominant phyllite.06-01DMU-Heading1NoneNoneNoneNoneMGS_LITTL2025.1Lower-grade metamorphic rock, of unspecified originMediumDMU008
10CZispslaty phylliteslaty phyllite subunit of the Ijamsville FormationLate Proterozoic to early CambrianDark gray, grayish purple, and dark bluish gray phyllite with local light gray streaks and layers of greenish gray tuffaceous phyllite. Unit parts in regular, millimeter-thick layers reminiscent of slaty cleavage. Contains common intervals of bluish gray, thin- to medium-bedded, locally laminated, argillaceous, ribbony Silver Run Limestone (CZisr). Stratification in limestone strata is up to 10 cm (4 inches) thick and highly contorted. This phyllite unit is partially equivalent to the Silver Run Limestone (srl) of Fisher (1978) and Sams Creek Silver Run Limestone (CZscsr) of Reger et al. (2004) in the New Windsor quadrangle, and the Silver Run Limestone of the Marburg Formation (mfs) of Edwards (1986) and Silver Run Limestone of the Sams Creek Formation (CZscsr) of Reger and Edwards (2006). Owing to deformation and inconsistent bedding indicators thickness is undeterminable.06-01-01DMU Unit 2_Zisp221222,235,222NoneMGS_LITTL2025.1|USGS_NEWWI1978|MGS_NEWWI2004.1|MGS_UNION1986|MGS_UNION2006.1Slate and phyllite, of sedimentary-rock originHighDMU009
11CZisrSilver Run LimestoneSilver Run Limestone subunit of the slaty phyllite subunit of the Ijamsville FormationLate Proterozoic to early CambrianCommon intervals of bluish gray, thin- to medium-bedded, locally laminated, argillaceous, ribbony Silver Run Limestone (CZisr) within the slaty phyllite subunit of the Ijamsville formation. Stratification in limestone strata is up to 10 cm (4 inches) thick and highly contorted.06-01-01-01DMU Unit 3_Zisr434179,179,204NoneMGS_LITTL2025.1Meta-carbonate rockHighDMU010
12CZimpmuscovite-chlorite-phyllitemuscovite-chlorite-phyllite subunit of the Ijamsville FormationLate Proterozoic to early CambrianLight greenish gray to grayish green, and tan to silvery phyllite. The micas and chlorite are typically segregated into prominent pinstripe laminations spaced 1 to 3 cm (0.4 to 1.2 inches) apart and parallel to cleavage. Resistant to weathering; crops out extensively and commonly forms low ridges capped by a thin sandy soil. Locally, light gray, discontinuous, tuffaceous sandstone can be mapped (CZiq). Corresponds to the Ijamsville mica-chlorite-quartz phyllite (ijqp) of Fisher (1978) that crops out west of the Avondale Fault and to the Gillis Formation (gf) of Edwards (1986).06-01-02DMU Unit 2_Zimp201222,235,255NoneMGS_LITTL2025.1|USGS_NEWWI1978|MGS_UNION1986Lower-grade metamorphic rock, of unspecified originMediumDMU011
14CZiqdiscontinuous tuffaceous sandstonetuffaceous sandstone subunit of the muscovite-chlorite-phyllite and the chlorite phyllite subunits of the Ijamsville FormationLate Proterozoic to early CambrianLocally, light gray to greenish gray, discontinuous, tuffaceous phyllitic sandstone. Can be found within both the muscovite-chlorite-phyllite (CZimp) subunit and the chlorite-phyllite (CZicp) subunit of the Ijamsville Formation.06-01-02-01DMU Unit 3_Ziq75255,153,102NoneMGS_LITTL2025.1QuartziteMediumDMU013
13CZicpchlorite-phyllitechlorite phyllite subunit of the Ijamsville FormationLate Proterozoic to early CambrianPale green to greenish gray phyllite. Contains subordinate amounts of paragonite and muscovite phyllite. Chloritic laminae commonly alternate with white mica-albite-quartz layers up to 5 mm (0.2 inch) thick; most of these layers parallel axial-plain cleavage and must be tectonic in origin, but some may be relict bedding laminations (Fisher, 1978). Locally, light gray, discontinuous, tuffaceous sandstone can be mapped (CZiq). Corresponds in part to the Sams Creek chlorite phyllite (sccp) of Fisher (1978) and the tuffaceous phyllite [also CZitp] of the Union Bridge quadrangle.06-01-03DMU Unit 2_Zicp311204,235,235NoneMGS_LITTL2025.1|USGS_NEWWI1978|MGS_UNION2006.1Lower-grade metamorphic rock, of unspecified originMediumDMU012
15CZitptuffaceous phyllitetuffaceous phyllite subunit of the Ijamsville FormationLate Proterozoic to early CambrianDark gray, grayish red, reddish purple, and bluish gray, silty, granular tuffaceous phyllite with light gray lapilli streaks and blebs. Intermixed with intervals of greenish gray to gray, tan-weathering, tuffaceous phyllite and silty tuffaceous phyllite. Contains intermixed variegated and lustrous to dull, purple to reddish gray hematitic muscovite phyllite and tan to green chlorite muscovite phyllite. Corresponds to parts of the Urbana Formation of Edwards (1986), tuffaceous phyllite of Brezinski et al. (2004), and Ijamsville Phyllite of Reger and Edwards (2006). Owing to deformation and inconsistent bedding indicators thickness cannot be determined.06-01-04DMU Unit 2_Zitp403179,204,255NoneMGS_LITTL2025.1|MGS_UNION1986|MGS_UNION2006.1|MGS_WALKE2004.1Intermediate-composition pyroclastic flowsMediumDMU014
16CZuUrbana FormationUrbana FormationLate Proterozoic to early CambrianDull, olive gray to light olive gray, silty, sandy, phyllite, metasiltstone, and argillaceous sandstone. Stratification obscured by deformational fabrics, but often preserve primary textures including grading, cross-bedding, ripple marked, and bioturbation. Discontinuous fine- to medium-grained, light olive gray and light brownish gray metasandstone (CZus) are friable, lenticular, and intensely cleaved. Interpreted to be partially equivalent to the Harpers Formation of Jonas (1928). Thickness is indeterminable.07-01DMU Unit 1_Zu24255,191,191NoneMGS_LITTL2025.1|MGS_CLGEO1928Lower-grade metamorphic rock, of unspecified originMediumDMU015
17CZusmetasandstonemetasandstone subunit of the Urbana FormationLate Proterozoic to early CambrianDiscontinuous fine- to medium-grained, light olive gray and light brownish gray metasandstone. Can be found within the Urbana Formation (CZu).07-01-01-01DMU Unit 3_Zus35255,166,166NoneMGS_LITTL2025.1QuartziteMediumDMU016
18CZmbMarburg FormationMarburg FormationLate Proterozoic to early CambrianPredominately greenish gray, pale olive gray, silvery gray, silty, sandy phyllite. Some intervals are dark gray, to dark greenish gray, exhibiting pinstriped foliation where phyllite layers are folded with light gray, quartz-rich layers. Minute (>0.01mm) disseminated flakes of hematite and pyrite are abundant. Formation contains localized layers of quartzose metasandstone to metagraywacke (CZmbs) vary from light to medium olive-gray, are medium- to coarse-grained, and can be foliated, blocky, or massive. Massive intervals of metasandstone can be up to 3 feet thick and comprised of subrounded quartz grains surrounded in a quartz and mica matrix. This interval is equivalent to the Urbana Formation of Edwards and Glaser (1993), and the Harpers Formation of Jonas (1928).08-01DMU Unit 1_Zmb244222,179,179NoneMGS_LITTL2025.1|MGS_LITTL1993|MGS_CLGEO1928Lower-grade metamorphic rock, of unspecified originMediumDMU017
19CZmbsquartzose metagreywacke/metasandstonequartzose metagreywacke/metasandstone subunit of the Marburg FormationLate Proterozoic to early CambrianLocalized layers of quartzose metasandstone to metagraywacke (CZmbs) vary from light to medium olive-gray, are medium- to coarse-grained, and can be foliated, blocky, or massive. Massive intervals of metasandstone can be up to 3 feet thick and comprised of subrounded quartz grains surrounded in a quartz and mica matrix. Can be found within the Marburg Formation (CZmb).08-01-01-01DMU Unit 3_Zmbs404179,179,255NoneMGS_LITTL2025.1QuartziteMediumDMU018

Glossary

OBJECTIDTermDefinitionDefinitionSourceIDGlossary_ID
21beddingFormed, arranged, or deposited in layers or beds, or made up of or occurring in the form of beds; esp. said of a layered sedimentary rock, deposit, or formation. The term has also been applied to nonsedimentary material that exhibits depositional layering, such as the "bedded deposits" of volcanic tuff alternating with lava in the mantle of a stratovolcano.AGI_2011GLO016
1certainIdentity of a feature can be determined using relevant observations and scientific judgment; therefore, one can be reasonably confident in the credibility of this interpretation.FGDC-STD-013-2006GLO001
23cleavageA locally planar fabric in an unmetamorphosed or weakly metamorphosed, fine-grained rock defined by either the tendency of a rock to split in a particular direction, a preferred orientation of crystal planes in mineral grains, or a preferred orientation of inequant grain shapes; it is a product of deformation or metamorphism.AGI_2011GLO018
18contactA plane or irregular surface between two different types or ages of rock, sediment or other geologic and stratigraphic units.AGI_2011GLO013
17cross section lineA plane or polyline along which a diagram is drawn showing the transected subsurface and topographic features and geology; specifically a vertical section drawn at right angles to the longer axis of a geologic feature.AGI_2011GLO012
11DMU-Heading1Header, bolded text, no indent, 11pt Times New Roman font. This format is used for groups or headings of formations (with members or subunits) where no group is present.MGS_LITTL2025.1GLO006
12DMU Unit 1Formation style, bolded title, 11pt Times New Roman font. This format is used for largest unit descriptions, usually formations; mapped at the surface, and may or may not contain subunits.MGS_LITTL2025.1GLO007
13DMU Unit 2Member, or major lithology style, bolded title, 11 pt Times New Roman font. This format is used for member, or other major lithologies found within a Formation unit.MGS_LITTL2025.1GLO008
14DMU Unit 3Minor lithology style, bolded title, 11 pt Times New Roman font. Generally used for subunits or beds within a formation or member. Text description within higher-order units.MGS_LITTL2025.1GLO009
19faultA discrete surface or zone of discrete surfaces separating two rock masses across which one mass has slid past the other.AGI_2011GLO014
20foldA curve or bend of a planar structure such as rock strata, bedding planes, foliation, or cleavage. A fold is usually a product of deformation, although its definition is descriptive and not genetic and may include primary structures.AGI_2011GLO015
22foliationA general term for a planar arrangement of textural or structural geatures in any type of rock, esp. the locally planar fabric in a rock defined by a fissility, a preferred orientation of crystal planes in mineral grains, a preferred orientation of inequant grain shapes, or from compositional banding. In igneous rocks, planar parallelism of flaky or tabular minerals and mineral aggregates, slabby xenoliths, or flattened vesicles as well as compositional layering. In metamorphic rocks, planar parallelism of flaky minerals and compositional layering.AGI_2011GLO017
9HighThe selected term in the GeoMaterial field (and its definition) adequately characterizes the overall lithologic nature of rocks and (or) sediments in the map unit.GeMS_2020GLO004
8inferredThe identity or the existence of a feature can be determined using relevant observations and scientific judgment, however its spatial location is not observable in the field.MGS_LITTL2025.1GLO003
10MediumThe selected term in the GeoMaterial field (and its definition) generally characterizes the overall lithologic nature of rocks and (or) sediments in the map unit, but one or more significant but minor lithologies are not adequately described by the selected term.GeMS_2020GLO005
16neatlineQuadrangle outline or mapped area boundary.MGS_LITTL2025.1GLO011
7questionableIdentity of a feature cannot be determined using relevant observations and scientific judgment; therefore, one cannot be reasonably confident in the credibility of this interpretation. For example, IdentityConfidence = questionable is appropriate when a geologist reasons "I can see some kind of planar feature that separates map units in this outcrop, but I cannot be certain if it is a contact or a fault."FGDC-STD-013-2006GLO002
24recreational GPSData collected with a mobile device using GIS software such as ESRI Field Maps or IGIS.MGS_LITTL2025.1GLO019
15state boundaryThe boundary between states as determined by the Maryland Physical Boundaries - County Boundaries (Detailed) feature hosted on MD iMap, reprojected into NAD 1983 (2011) StatePlane Maryland FIPS 1900 (US Feet) [WKID 6488].MGS_LITTL2025.1GLO010

Database Inventory

This summary of database content is provided as a convenience to GIS analysts, reviewers, and others. It is not part of the GeMS compliance criteria.

DataSources, nonspatial table, 16 rows
DescriptionOfMapUnits, nonspatial table, 18 rows
GeoMaterialDict, nonspatial table, 101 rows
Glossary, nonspatial table, 19 rows
GeologicMap, feature dataset
MapUnitOverlayPolys, simple polygon feature class, 18 rows
ContactsAndFaults, simple polyline feature class, 369 rows
GeologicLines, simple polyline feature class, 29 rows
CartographicLines, simple polyline feature class, 1 rows
MapUnitLines, simple polyline feature class, 50 rows
OrientationPoints, simple point feature class, 135 rows
MapUnitPolys, simple polygon feature class, 76 rows
Stations, simple point feature class, 302 rows